Autorja britanike boton romanin e saj t\u00eb par\u00eb historik. \u00cbsht\u00eb i vendosur n\u00eb epok\u00ebn viktoriane, me nj\u00eb kasap q\u00eb reklamon se \u00ebsht\u00eb baron. \u00abNuk tregoj bot\u00ebn e sotme n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet s\u00eb kaluar\u00ebs: jo, dua t\u00eb rikonfiguroj t\u00eb kaluar\u00ebn. Qasja m\u00eb e keqe \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia midis Anglis\u00eb dhe Gjermanis\u00eb: ishte nj\u00eb lidhje e keqe. Isha koha e Charles Dickens: nj\u00eb tregimtar i lindur, por p\u00ebr t\u00eb vet\u00ebm ajo q\u00eb ai shikon dhe ai Xhamajk\u00ebn nuk e shikonte…\u00bb.<\/p>\n
Ajo ka kaluar direkt nga stadi i f\u00ebmj\u00ebs gjeni n\u00eb at\u00eb t\u00eb dam\u00ebs s\u00eb letrave, duke kap\u00ebrcyer fazat e nd\u00ebrmjetme: dhe tani, m\u00eb shum\u00eb se 20 vjet nga debutimi i bujsh\u00ebm me Dh\u00ebmb\u00ebt e bardh\u00eb<\/em>, Zadie Smith (Lond\u00ebr, vitlindja 1975) \u00e7imentohet p\u00ebr her\u00ebn e par\u00eb me romanin historik. Tek The Fraud <\/em>(\u00abMashtrimi\u00bb, q\u00eb del n\u00eb Itali si Mashtruesi<\/em>) ka gjith\u00e7ka: rasti i kasapit q\u00eb reklamonte se ishte nj\u00eb baron \u2013 nj\u00eb proces q\u00eb magjepsi Londr\u00ebn viktoriane \u2014 Anglia dhe Xhamajka e \u2018800, shkrimtar\u00eb real\u00eb apo t\u00eb riimagjinuar (pashmangshm\u00ebrisht, shfaqet edhe Charles Dickens), skllav\u00ebria, psikologjia e masave t\u00eb magjepsura nga sharlatan\u00ebt populist\u00eb, refleksionet lidhur me let\u00ebrsin\u00eb.<\/p>\n Ju keni th\u00ebn\u00eb se i ken\u00eb l\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb bien rezistencat ndaj ides\u00eb s\u00eb shkrimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb romani historik dhe t\u00eb pasurit n\u00eb fund kompozuar nj\u00eb: por n\u00eb realitet libri \u00ebsht\u00eb gjith\u00e7ka p\u00ebrve\u00e7se nj\u00eb roman historik, \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb metaroman, \u00ebsht\u00eb metalet\u00ebrsi, nj\u00eb pilul\u00eb pasmoderne q\u00eb vet\u00ebm Zadie Smith mund ta shkruante. Pse keni p\u00ebrdorur pik\u00ebrisht form\u00ebn e romanit historik p\u00ebr t\u00eb shpejtuar t\u00eb gjith\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb synoni t\u00eb shpejtoni, q\u00eb natyrisht \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7ka tjet\u00ebr?<\/strong><\/p>\n (pauz\u00eb e gjat\u00eb<\/em>) \u00abAskush nuk ma ka b\u00ebr\u00eb deri m\u00eb tani pyetjen n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb kaq direkte! N\u00ebse m\u00eb duhet t\u00eb jem e ndeshme, ju keni t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cmeta \u2013 gj\u00ebn\u00eb\u201d, ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me prejardhjen time nga vitet \u201990: \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb heq\u00ebsh dor\u00eb nga ai zakon. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb moment, kur fillon t\u00eb diskutosh p\u00ebr disa ide, \u00ebsht\u00eb sikur gjuha t\u00eb ishte tashm\u00eb e vendosur: pra duhet t\u00eb gjesh rrug\u00eb p\u00ebr ta xhiruar penges\u00ebn dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb menduar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pavarur. Prandaj dua t\u00eb shkruaj p\u00ebr at\u00eb q\u00eb flasin t\u00eb gjith\u00eb, por nuk dua t\u00eb p\u00ebrdor nj\u00eb gjuh\u00eb q\u00eb e p\u00ebrdorin t\u00eb gjith\u00eb: mbi baz\u00ebn e parimit t\u00eb Ludwig Wittgenstein, sipas t\u00eb cilit gjuha p\u00ebrcakton argumentimin dhe nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb neutrale\u00bb.<\/p>\n Pra keni p\u00ebrdorur romanin historik si nj\u00eb ekran p\u00ebr ta \u00e7uar lexuesin n\u00eb drejtimin nga donit ta \u00e7onit?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abPo, por n\u00eb kuptimin se dua t\u00eb flas p\u00ebr bot\u00ebn bashk\u00ebkohore n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet s\u00eb kaluar\u00ebs, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo q\u00eb romanet historike b\u00ebjn\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb: doja n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb ta rikonfiguroja t\u00eb kaluar\u00ebn. Nj\u00ebra prej gj\u00ebrave q\u00eb m\u00eb ngjall m\u00eb shum\u00eb bezdi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb version i s\u00eb kaluar\u00ebs q\u00eb nuk e njoh, sidomos n\u00eb raport me epok\u00ebn viktoriane: doja ta shp\u00ebtoja pjes\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj historie\u00bb.<\/p>\n Cili \u00ebsht\u00eb mashtrimi i titullit: kasapi q\u00eb pretendon se \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb lord? Shoq\u00ebria e rr\u00ebfyer n\u00eb romanet viktoriane q\u00eb kishte nj\u00eb n\u00ebndhe dhune dhe skllav\u00ebrie? Apo vet\u00eb let\u00ebrsia dhe shkrimtar\u00ebt, q\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb mashtruesa?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abT\u00eb treja k\u00ebto gj\u00ebra! (qesh<\/em>). Jam e interesuar p\u00ebr faktin dhe kjo ndoshta \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb ide katolike, se jan\u00eb m\u00ebkatet dhe q\u00eb mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb me intensitet ndryshe. Deri kan\u00eb fjal\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshme, si m\u00ebkati vdekjeprur\u00ebs dhe nj\u00eb… i vog\u00ebl? Si quhet?\u00bb.<\/p>\n M\u00ebkat kapital dhe m\u00ebkat venial.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abVenial, ja! Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb ide etike shum\u00eb interesante: e kemi tashm\u00eb n\u00eb jet\u00ebn e r\u00ebndomt\u00eb iden\u00eb se ekzistojn\u00eb larmi t\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit krim n\u00eb nivele t\u00eb ndryshme, si vrasja e q\u00ebllimshme apo fajtore. Kjo pjes\u00eb e mendimit katolik m\u00eb intereson shum\u00eb, por n\u00ebse flasim p\u00ebr mashtrimin, m\u00eb e madhja \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo midis Anglis\u00eb dhe Xhamajk\u00ebs: e tyrja \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb raport i bazuar mbi mashtrimin dhe vet\u00ebiluzionin, nj\u00eb raport i keq. Ama n\u00ebse zbresim n\u00eb m\u00ebkatet e vogla <\/em>(e thot\u00eb n\u00eb italisht, sh\u00ebnimi im.<\/em>), ato t\u00eb vanitetit dhe t\u00eb budallall\u00ebkut: k\u00ebto jan\u00eb edhe pjes\u00eb e jet\u00ebs njer\u00ebzore. Kur isha m\u00eb e re interesohesha p\u00ebr m\u00ebkatet e vogla qe sharake q\u00eb njer\u00ebzit b\u00ebjn\u00eb. Tani q\u00eb jam m\u00eb e moshuar, shkalla e tyre \u00ebsht\u00eb zgjeruar\u00bb.<\/p>\n Dhe tani jeni m\u00eb e interesuar p\u00ebr m\u00ebkatet kapitale…<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abPo (qesh<\/em>), do t\u00eb thoja q\u00eb po…\u00bb.<\/p>\n Ju shkruani se Anglia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb alibi. \u00c7far\u00eb n\u00ebnkupton?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abGeorge Orwell shkroi di\u00e7ka q\u00eb e gjej interesante: Anglia \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb tok\u00eb hipokrit\u00ebsh dhe mendoj se t\u00eb gjith\u00eb n\u00eb Europ\u00eb e din\u00eb. Ama Orwell shton: m\u00eb mir\u00eb hipokrit\u00eb sesa fashist\u00eb, pasi fashisti as nuk shtiret. Hipokrizia e anglez\u00ebve m\u00eb t\u00ebrbon, por p\u00ebrmban filizin e nj\u00eb ideali ndaj t\u00eb cilit mund t\u00eb aspirosh\u00bb.<\/p>\n Thoni se mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb avantazh?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abNuk \u00ebsht\u00eb avantazh: por n\u00eb shkall\u00ebn morale \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsim respektivisht fashizmit, edhe pse nuk themelon nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebri n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin do t\u00eb doje t\u00eb jetoje n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb\u00bb.<\/p>\n Anglia, Xhamajka, shkrimtar\u00ebt: ju arrini gjithmon\u00eb ta fusni veten t\u00ebnde n\u00eb libra. Si e keni trajtuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb roman, ku e jetuara jote shkon p\u00ebrtej p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs individuale dhe skem\u00eb historike?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abKam parandjer\u00eb shum\u00eb nga ajo q\u00eb do ta quaja z\u00ebm\u00ebrim i kontrolluar dhe nj\u00eb pabesueshm\u00ebri t\u00eb caktuar. Un\u00eb jam britaniko \u2013 xhamjakne dhe im shoq \u00ebsht\u00eb irlandez dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb lexohet p\u00ebr Anglin\u00eb viktoriane pa q\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha rrug\u00ebt t\u00eb \u00e7ojn\u00eb ose n\u00eb Xhamajk\u00eb, ose n\u00eb Irland\u00eb. N\u00eb nj\u00eb shkoll\u00eb angleze, nj\u00eb e gjenerat\u00ebs time m\u00ebsonte m\u00eb shum\u00eb p\u00ebr Mussolini sesa n\u00eb Angli e Xhamajk\u00eb apo Angli e Irland\u00eb. Kur isha vajz\u00eb mendoja p\u00ebr sistemin ang\u00ebet si di\u00e7ka t\u00eb mir\u00eb, sepse m\u00eb edukonte falas dhe kujdesej p\u00ebr mua, edhe pse bezdisesha; ama n\u00eb politikat edukative, kur merrej me historin\u00eb e \u2018800, duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebnin nj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb shmangur k\u00ebto pyetje: ideologjia q\u00eb ishte prapa e gjej shum\u00eb deprimuese. P\u00ebr f\u00ebmij\u00ebt e emigrant\u00ebve, xhamajkian\u00eb dhe irlandez\u00eb, do t\u00eb ishte shum\u00eb e dobishme t\u00eb kuptohej sesi kan\u00eb arritur k\u00ebtu\u00bb.<\/p>\n Dickens rri pezull mbi t\u00eb gjith\u00eb romanin. Si ka qen\u00eb lufta juaj me Dickens? Keni hyr\u00eb n\u00eb marr\u00ebveshje me trash\u00ebgimin\u00eb e tij?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abN\u00ebse nj\u00eb lufton me t\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb luft\u00eb me veten time! Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb romancieri i till\u00eb puro: shum\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb, fal\u00eb Zotit (qesh<\/em>), por ai \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb romancier nga fundi n\u00eb maj\u00eb dhe ka frik\u00eb se jam edhe un\u00eb, edhe pse do t\u00eb preferoja q\u00eb jo! Si p\u00ebr shum\u00eb njer\u00ebz, p\u00ebr mua ai \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00ebherazi heroik dhe zhg\u00ebnjyes: \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebhtir\u00eb t\u00eb mendohet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb shkrimtar tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb bot\u00eb, pjes\u00ebrisht ndoshta Angela Davis, q\u00eb ka ndryshuar ligjet e vendit t\u00ebnd dhe se lidhur me vendin t\u00ebnd ka pasur nj\u00eb efekt politik t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb, por isha e interesuar edhe p\u00ebr at\u00eb mund ta quajm\u00eb politika sentimentale e tij, at\u00eb t\u00eb dashurit t\u00eb shikimit t\u00eb di\u00e7kaje me syt\u00eb e tuaj dhe p\u00ebr ta provuar: situata xhamajkiane \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shembull klasik, as nuk e kisha par\u00eb, as provuar dhe, p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, nuk qesh\u00eb e interesuar. Kjo m\u00eb p\u00ebrket jo sepse dua t\u00eb d\u00ebnoj Dickens, por sepse i njoh instinktin. M\u00eb kujton kur, gjat\u00eb kriz\u00ebs s\u00eb emigrant\u00ebve t\u00eb disa viteve m\u00eb par\u00eb, kriz\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00eb realitet vazhdon akoma, u p\u00ebrhap fotoja e f\u00ebmij\u00ebs s\u00eb vdekur n\u00eb plazh: kjo ptati nj\u00eb impakt emotiv t\u00eb madh, por problemi i k\u00ebsaj lloj politike \u00ebsht\u00eb se kur efekti emotiv pushon s\u00eb ndjeri, at\u00ebhere pushon s\u00eb menduari. Do t\u00eb doja t\u00eb thoja se Italia \u00ebsht\u00eb ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht e prirur ndaj politik\u00ebs s\u00eb syve, pse p\u00eblqeni t\u2019i shikoni gj\u00ebrat, p\u00eblqeni t\u00eb bukur\u00ebn, syri do pjes\u00ebn e tij dhe e gjith\u00eb kjo logjik\u00eb italiane (qesh<\/em>): vet\u00ebdija vizive \u00ebsht\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonisht subjektive, por nuk ke nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb nj\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00eb t\u00eb vdekur n\u00eb plazh p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar se di\u00e7ka e tmerrshme \u00ebsht\u00eb duke ndodhur\u00bb.<\/p>\n Ju shkruani se romanet jan\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebra nga \u00abpjes\u00eb t\u00eb konsumuara dhe t\u00eb v\u00ebrteta t\u00eb vjedhura\u00bb: besoni akoma n\u00eb let\u00ebrsin\u00eb dhe n\u00eb rolin q\u00eb mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abOh po! Nuk jam cinike, i dua v\u00ebrtet romanet! Po lexoj Et\u00ebr e bij <\/em>t\u00eb Ivan Turgenev p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb transformuese, po m\u00eb ndryshon n\u00eb thelb. Shum\u00eb romane jan\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebqinj apo jo aq t\u00eb mir\u00eb, por her\u00ebpas\u00ebhere disa romane jan\u00eb t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonsh\u00ebm. E dua romanin: duke shikuar nga pas, \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb se ata t\u00eb mir\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u gjetur\u00bb.<\/p>\n Cil\u00ebt libra t\u00eb tjer\u00eb e kan\u00eb ndryshuar jet\u00ebn dhe perspektiv\u00ebn t\u00ebnde?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abJam mjaft poroze, t\u00eb gjith\u00eb e b\u00ebjn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb far\u00eb m\u00ebnyre: Virginia Woolf thoshte se edhe librat e k\u00ebqinj e b\u00ebjn\u00eb, pasi t\u00eb m\u00ebsojn\u00eb si t\u00eb mos shkruash, mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb mjaft t\u00eb dobish\u00ebm. Si e re ata q\u00eb kan\u00eb vlejtur v\u00ebrtet p\u00ebr mua kan\u00eb qen\u00eb Alice Walker, Toni Morrison, Lev Tolstoj, Vladimir Nabokov, Italo Calvino. Je e formuar nga librat q\u00eb lexon vajza e re\u00bb.<\/p>\n Ju jeni edhe nj\u00eb kritike letrare, p\u00ebrve\u00e7se nj\u00eb shkrimtare: si pajtohen k\u00ebta dy element\u00eb n\u00eb procesin t\u00ebnd krijues?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abToni Morrison thoshte se t\u00eb shkruash, t\u00eb m\u00ebsosh, t\u00eb b\u00ebsh re\u00e7ensione \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb gj\u00eb e vetme. Nuk ka asnj\u00eb dallim n\u00eb mendjen time, nuk jam n\u00eb ankth nga kritika q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb tek un\u00eb, m\u00eb p\u00eblqen t\u00eb shkruaj kritik\u00eb dhe m\u00eb p\u00eblqen t\u00eb shkruaj narrativ\u00eb: nuk mund t\u00eb jesh nj\u00eb shkrimtar i zoti pa qen\u00eb nj\u00eb kritik i vet\u00eb pun\u00ebs t\u00ebnde dhe ta p\u00ebrballosh n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb nxjerr\u00ebsh pjes\u00ebn m\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00eb, shpresohet\u00bb.<\/p>\n Dhe si kritike jeni e bindur p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb lib\u00ebr t\u00eb fundit?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abE dini nj\u00eb gj\u00eb? Ka nj\u00eb citim t\u00eb bukur t\u00eb VirginiaWoolf q\u00eb thot\u00eb se tre jav\u00eb pasi ke p\u00ebrfunduar t\u00eb shkruash nj\u00eb roman mendon: jo, do t\u00eb duhej ta shkruaja k\u00ebshtu! Dhe kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb normalisht ajo q\u00eb provoj: m\u00eb duhet t\u00eb them se ky \u00ebsht\u00eb sakt\u00ebsisht libri q\u00eb doja t\u00eb shkruaja…\u00bb.<\/p>\n Dhe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb…<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00abPo, p\u00ebr nj\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb gjat\u00eb. Ka qen\u00eb nj\u00eb k\u00ebnaq\u00ebsi, nj\u00eb sodisfaksion p\u00ebr ta mbaruar. \u00c7do pjes\u00eb e vog\u00ebl, \u00e7do kapitull p\u00ebr mua ka nj\u00eb rezonanc\u00eb: jam e k\u00ebnaqur dhe kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb gj\u00eb e bukur kur t\u00eb ndodh, t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn nj\u00eb her\u00eb n\u00eb jet\u00eb\u00bb.<\/p>\n (nga La Lettura<\/em>)<\/p>\n P\u00ebrgatiti<\/strong><\/p>\n ARMIN TIRANA<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Autorja britanike boton romanin e saj t\u00eb par\u00eb historik. \u00cbsht\u00eb i vendosur n\u00eb epok\u00ebn viktoriane, me nj\u00eb kasap q\u00eb reklamon se \u00ebsht\u00eb baron. \u00abNuk tregoj bot\u00ebn e sotme n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet s\u00eb kaluar\u00ebs: jo, dua t\u00eb rikonfiguroj t\u00eb kaluar\u00ebn. Qasja m\u00eb e keqe \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia midis Anglis\u00eb dhe Gjermanis\u00eb: ishte nj\u00eb lidhje e keqe. Isha koha e …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":62688,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62687"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62687\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}