Presidenti Ilir Meta ka vendosur t\u00eb padis\u00eb n\u00eb prokurori Kuvendin, p\u00ebr akuz\u00ebn e falsifikimit.<\/p>\n
\u2018Sapo fal\u00ebnderova Bledin dhe Katrin, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimin me dinjitet dhe profesionaliz\u00ebm t\u00eb Institucionit t\u00eb Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
I k\u00ebrkova t\u00eb p\u00ebrgatisin menj\u00ebher\u00eb padin\u00eb p\u00ebr falsifikimin e provave nga Kuvendi, t\u00eb depozituar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese pa asnj\u00eb lloj k\u00ebrkese.<\/p>\n
Ky skandal shum\u00eb i r\u00ebnd\u00eb, duhet t\u00eb marr\u00eb menj\u00ebher\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ligjore!<\/p>\n
Takohemi shum\u00eb shpejt n\u00eb nj\u00eb komunikim me mediat!\u2019, shkruan presidenti Ilir Meta n\u00eb Facebook.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebshilltari i Presidentit p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet Ligjore, Bledar Dervishaj\u00a0ka zbuluar sot para medias me fakte dokumentet\u00a0e\u00a0falsifikuar nga parlamenti, pjes\u00eb e\u00a0“marr\u00ebzis\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb fundit t\u00eb Kuvendit t\u00eb ri, q\u00eb ndjek me besnik\u00ebri t\u00eb plot\u00eb rrug\u00ebn e manipulimit dhe falsifikimit t\u00eb provave nga Kuvendi nj\u00ebpartiak”, si\u00e7 e cil\u00ebsoi.<\/p>\n
Dervishaj tha:”N\u00eb seanc\u00ebn e or\u00ebs 10:00, ne i kemi k\u00ebrkuar Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, kemi kund\u00ebrshtuar v\u00ebrtet\u00ebsin\u00eb e nj\u00eb prove t\u00eb depozituar s\u00eb fundmi nga Kuvendi i Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, t\u00eb depozituar n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 4 shkurt 2022, i cili i p\u00ebrcjell Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, pra dit\u00ebn e premte, sipas Kuvendit, disa prova t\u00eb reja shtes\u00eb ku p\u00ebrfshihet edhe Urdhri nr.19, dat\u00eb 5.5.2021 i Kryetarit t\u00eb Kuvendit q\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me mbledhjen e Kuvendit m\u00eb dat\u00eb 7.5.2021, pra dit\u00ebn q\u00eb Kuvendi do t\u00eb miratonte sipas tij ngritjen e komisionit hetimor dhe miratimin e raportit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Ligjeve.<\/p>\n
Gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre provave t\u00eb reja q\u00eb na u vun\u00eb n\u00eb dispozicion nga Gjykata po n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn dit\u00eb, na rezulton q\u00eb n\u00eb konsultim me vet\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjen e praktik\u00ebs s\u00eb d\u00ebrguar nga Kuvendi, dhe me praktik\u00ebn e publikuar online po nga Kuvendi, na rezulton nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje apo manipulim prove t\u00eb depozituar. Pse e themi k\u00ebt\u00eb?!<\/p>\n
Ia parashkruam Gjykat\u00ebs n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar, i \u00ebsht\u00eb parashtruar Gjykat\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjet sepse lidhej me nj\u00eb pyetje q\u00eb kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb relatori n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjet, p\u00ebrgjigja nr. 3, lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje.<\/p>\n
Konkretisht, urdhri q\u00eb Kuvendi i\u00a0depozitoi si prov\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, mban dat\u00ebn q\u00eb mund ta shikoni k\u00ebtu, 5.5.2021 \u201cP\u00ebr mbledhjen e Kuvendit n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 7.5.2021\u201d, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb sipas urdhrit t\u00eb publikuar n\u00eb faqen e Kuvendit t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, meq\u00eb u pranua dhe nga p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesit e Kuvendit n\u00eb gjykim, ky urdh\u00ebr mban dat\u00ebn 6.5.2021 dhe jo 5.5.2021! Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrja e par\u00eb. Edhe ky urdh\u00ebr n\u00eb faqen e Kuvendit \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin format me n\u00ebnshkrim t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb Kuvendit.<\/p>\n
Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrja e par\u00eb dhe pse b\u00ebhet kjo nd\u00ebrhyrje, ose m\u00eb sakt\u00eb u parashtrua nga p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesit e Kuvendit, q\u00eb provat e reja t\u00eb sillen p\u00ebr t\u00eb rr\u00ebzuar pretendimin e Presidentit lidhur me shkeljet q\u00eb ne kishim konstatuar n\u00eb caktimin e seanc\u00ebs plenare dhe t\u00eb rendit t\u00eb dit\u00ebs. Por kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e vetmja nd\u00ebrhyrje!<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrhyrje ka dhe tek pika 20 e k\u00ebtij urdhri, ku p\u00ebrfshihet projektvendimi p\u00ebr raportin e propozimit t\u00eb Komisionit p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet Ligjore, Administrat\u00ebn Publike dhe t\u00eb t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut p\u00ebr ngritjen ose mosngritjen e nj\u00eb komisioni hetimor p\u00ebr shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs. K\u00ebshtu thot\u00eb kjo pik\u00eb 20 e k\u00ebtij urdhri q\u00eb u depozitua n\u00eb form\u00eb shkresore, por q\u00eb ndryshon nga pika 20 e rendit t\u00eb dit\u00ebs, t\u00eb sjell\u00eb po n\u00eb form\u00eb shkresore nga Kuvendi n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e prov\u00ebs n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n
Rendi i dit\u00ebs p\u00ebrcakton q\u00eb urdhri \u00ebsht\u00eb nr. 19, dat\u00eb 6.5.2021 dhe jo 5.5.2021 si\u00e7 thot\u00eb dhe si\u00e7 ka depozituar Kuvendi, nd\u00ebrhyrja e par\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Rendi i dit\u00ebs thot\u00eb q\u00eb pika 20 p\u00ebrmban k\u00ebt\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtje q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb shqyrtohet sipas Kuvendit: \u201cP\u00ebr miratimin e raportit dhe propozimit t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb \u00c7\u00ebshtjeve Ligjore, p\u00ebr ngritjen e nj\u00eb komisioni hetimor , bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e nj\u00eb grupi deputet\u00ebsh p\u00ebr shkarkimin nga detyra t\u00eb Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs . N\u00eb pamje t\u00eb par\u00eb duket sikur nuk ka nd\u00ebrhyrje, por ka. Ka. Po t\u00eb shikojm\u00eb me v\u00ebmendje nga p\u00ebrmbajtja e rendit t\u00eb dit\u00ebs t\u00eb publikuar n\u00eb faqe dhe urdhrit t\u00eb depozituar n\u00eb form\u00eb shkresore, na rezulton se:<\/p>\n
– Ky urdh\u00ebr q\u00eb depozitoi Kuvendi m\u00eb 4 shkurt 2022,i \u00ebsht\u00eb hequr fjala \u201cMiratim\u201d. Nuk ekziston m\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjen e pik\u00ebs 20.
\n– Fjala \u201craporti\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsuar me fjal\u00ebn \u201craportit\u201d
\n– Fjala \u201cpropozim\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsuar me fjal\u00ebn \u201cpropozimin\u201d
\n– Lidh\u00ebza \u201ct\u00eb\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsuar me lidh\u00ebsen \u201ce\u201d
\n– Pas fjal\u00ebs \u201cngritjen\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb shtuar fjala \u201cose mosngritjen\u201d
\n– Dhe togfjal\u00ebshi \u201cbazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e nj\u00eb grupi deputet\u00ebsh\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb hequr fare.<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb edhe rendi i dit\u00ebs i depozituar bashk\u00eb me urdhrin e Kryetarit t\u00eb Kuvendit ka p\u00ebrplasje me vet\u00eb urdhrin e Kryetarit t\u00eb Kuvendit. Pik\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr k\u00ebto shkaqe, k\u00ebto nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb prova, \u00ebhst\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar nga ana jon\u00eb si p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues t\u00eb Presidentit q\u00eb Gjykata t\u00eb \u00e7moj\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebsin\u00eb e k\u00ebsja prove pasi duket qart\u00eb se ka nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb t\u00eb me q\u00ebllimin e vet\u00ebm dhe q\u00eb u pranua q\u00eb kjo prov\u00eb sillet nga Kuvendi p\u00ebr t\u00eb rr\u00ebzuar pretendimet e Presidentit, me q\u00ebllim q\u00eb t\u00eb rr\u00ebzohen pretendimet e Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qoft\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb form\u00eb si\u00e7 e \u00e7on Kuvendi, q\u00eb ka nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje, qoft\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb form\u00ebn reale, q\u00ebndrimet e Presidentit rezultojn\u00eb t\u00eb bazuara. Seanca plenare \u00ebsht\u00eb caktuar n\u00eb m\u00eb pak se 24 or\u00eb , kur detyrimi \u00ebsht\u00eb 48 or\u00eb dhe n\u00eb rendin e dit\u00ebs nuk kan\u00eb q\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb dy akte, por vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb akt. Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr shkelje m\u00eb shum\u00eb kjo e Kuvendit t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb, vet\u00ebm e vet\u00ebm t\u00eb diktuar p\u00ebrmes vullnetit politik q\u00eb t\u00eb arrinte ngritjen e nj\u00eb komisioni q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb funksiononte sipas Kushtetues dhe ligjit p\u00ebr komisionin hetimor\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Presidenti Ilir Meta ka vendosur t\u00eb padis\u00eb n\u00eb prokurori Kuvendin, p\u00ebr akuz\u00ebn e falsifikimit. \u2018Sapo fal\u00ebnderova Bledin dhe Katrin, p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimin me dinjitet dhe profesionaliz\u00ebm t\u00eb Institucionit t\u00eb Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs. I k\u00ebrkova t\u00eb p\u00ebrgatisin menj\u00ebher\u00eb padin\u00eb p\u00ebr falsifikimin e provave nga Kuvendi, t\u00eb depozituar n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese pa asnj\u00eb lloj k\u00ebrkese. Ky skandal shum\u00eb …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4015,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}