{"id":33617,"date":"2023-01-11T11:01:49","date_gmt":"2023-01-11T11:01:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/?p=33617"},"modified":"2023-01-11T11:01:49","modified_gmt":"2023-01-11T11:01:49","slug":"gjeopolitika-e-te-dhenave-shtetet-e-bashkuara-dhe-bashkimi-europian-drejt-nje-marerveshjeje","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/2023\/01\/11\/gjeopolitika-e-te-dhenave-shtetet-e-bashkuara-dhe-bashkimi-europian-drejt-nje-marerveshjeje\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjeopolitika e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave: Shtetet e Bashkuara dhe Bashkimi Europian drejt nj\u00eb mar\u00ebrveshjeje"},"content":{"rendered":"

N\u00eb vitin 2016 Komisioni Europian shqiptohej n\u00eb favor t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtashm\u00ebris\u00eb lidhur me Privacy Shield<\/em>, framework<\/em> normativ q\u00eb rregullonte fluksin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara dhe Bashkimit Europian. Kat\u00ebr vite m\u00eb pas, Gjykata e Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb e Bashkimit Europian ka nxjerr\u00eb Vendimin Schrems II, duke e anulluar k\u00ebshtu Privacy Shield. N\u00eb jav\u00ebt e kaluara Komisioni Europian ka rilan\u00e7uar procesin formal e prirur drejt adoptimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb vendimi p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebrie p\u00ebr transferimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Bashkimit Europian dhe Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara p\u00ebr ta normuar s\u00ebrish fluksin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave. Midis marr\u00ebveshjesh dhe mosmarr\u00ebveshjesh, t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat fitojn\u00eb gjithnj\u00eb e m\u00eb shum\u00eb atribut gjeopolitik.<\/p>\n

Ishte viti i larg\u00ebt 2016 kur Komisioni Europian shqiptohej n\u00eb favor t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00eb merit\u00eb t\u00eb Privacy Shield<\/em>, framework<\/em> normativ n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e transferimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara dhe Bashkimit Europian. Marr\u00ebveshja ishte e prirur t\u00eb mbronte t\u00eb drejtat themelore t\u00eb njer\u00ebzve n\u00eb Bashkimin Europian, n\u00eb rastin ku t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat personale t\u00eb transferoheshin n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara. Marr\u00ebveshja p\u00ebrkufizonte rregulla po ashtu specifike p\u00ebr bizneset q\u00eb kryenin transferimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave transatlantike. Kat\u00ebr vite m\u00eb pas, Gjykata e Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb e Bashkimit Europian shqiptohej kund\u00ebr regjimit t\u00eb transferimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave n\u00eb kuadrin e Vendimit Schrems II, duke e anulluar k\u00ebshtu Privacy Shield<\/em>. N\u00eb vijim t\u00eb anullimit t\u00eb Privacy Shield<\/em>, Komisioni Europian ka rilan\u00e7uar procesin formal e prirur n\u00eb adoptimin e nj\u00eb vendimi p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebrie p\u00ebr transferimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Bashkimit Europian dhe Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara p\u00ebr ta normuar s\u00ebrish fluksin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, duke miratuar nj\u00eb boc\u00eb t\u00eb vendimit.<\/p>\n

Komisioni Europian mbi Urdh\u00ebrin Ekzekutiv t\u00eb Biden<\/strong><\/p>\n

Boca e vendimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb e shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb nga Komisioni Europian m\u00eb 13 dhjetor ka vijuar Urdh\u00ebrin Ekzekutiv t\u00eb firmosur n\u00eb tetor nga presidenti i Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara Joe Biden. Urdh\u00ebri Ekzekutiv ka p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuar k\u00ebshtu nj\u00eb shtytje t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme p\u00ebr t\u00eb implementuar kuadrin e ri rregullues n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e privat\u00ebsis\u00eb midis Kontinentit t\u00eb Vjet\u00ebr e Bot\u00ebs s\u00eb Re dhe m\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb respektivisht me ndarjen e aksesin n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat personale nga ana e organeve qeveritare amerikane. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb vendosur n\u00eb linj\u00eb vijueshm\u00ebrie me sa parashikohet n\u00eb terma t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme nga Rregullimi i P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm mbi Mbrojtjen e t\u00eb Dh\u00ebnave Europiane. N\u00eb detaje, Biden \u00ebsht\u00eb impenjuar t\u2019i rip\u00ebrcaktoj\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb substanciale limitet n\u00eb aksesin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave nga inteligjenca amerikane, duke e kufizuar t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e aksesit nga situatat e dalluara nga nevoja, proporcionaliteti dhe garancia e siguris\u00eb komb\u00ebtare. Ve\u00e7 k\u00ebsaj, \u00ebsht\u00eb synimi i administrat\u00ebs amerikane t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb nj\u00eb mekaniz\u00ebm tutele n\u00eb favor t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve europian\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb ken\u00eb akses falas n\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet nj\u00eb tribunali rishikimi t\u00eb mbrojtjes t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, t\u00eb pavarur. Pozicioni i presidentit amerikan k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb t\u2019i vendos\u00eb fre aksesit t\u00eb tepruar nga ana e sh\u00ebrbimeve amerikane t\u00eb siguris\u00eb, q\u00eb kishte p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb thelbin e mosdakord\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe r\u00ebnduar substancialisht mbi anullimin e Privacy Shield<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Prandaj Urdh\u00ebri Ekzekutiv i Joe Biden \u00ebsht\u00eb i prirur t\u2019i rip\u00ebrcaktoj\u00eb n\u00eb prizmin e p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm finalitetet, si edhe kufizimet dhe p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsit\u00eb t\u00eb cilave do t\u2019u n\u00ebnshtrohen agjencit\u00eb amerikane t\u00eb inteligjenc\u00ebs, jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb nivel normativ, por edhe operativ. Lidhur me k\u00ebt\u00eb del sesi aktivitetet e kryera nga inteligjenca, n\u00eb vend q\u00eb t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb prirura t\u00eb garantojn\u00eb sigurin\u00eb komb\u00ebtare, duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb n\u00eb linj\u00eb dhe t\u00eb proporcionuara respektivisht prioriteteve t\u00eb identifikuara. N\u00ebse d\u00ebshirohet, edhe nj\u00eb her\u00eb akoma, t\u00eb bilancohet ruajtja e vendit dhe impakti mbi jet\u00ebt private dhe lirit\u00eb civile e njer\u00ebzve t\u00eb interesuara, pavar\u00ebsisht shtet\u00ebsis\u00eb apo vendit t\u00eb banimit. Q\u00ebllimet e mira amerikane nuk jan\u00eb mir\u00ebpritur nga Bashkimi Europian. Premisa e boc\u00ebs s\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb hap n\u00eb fakt transferimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave personale edhe n\u00eb hipotez\u00ebn ku niveli i mbrojtjes s\u00eb shtetit t\u00eb tret\u00eb nuk ishte spekular me at\u00eb europian. \u00cbsht\u00eb e mjaftueshme q\u00eb niveli i mbrojtjes s\u00eb garantuar t\u00eb jet\u00eb i asimiluesh\u00ebm. Kjo implikon q\u00eb mjetet t\u00eb cilat p\u00ebrdor vendi i tret\u00eb mund t\u00eb ndryshojn\u00eb nga ato t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorura nga Bashkimi Europian boll q\u00eb t\u00eb demonstrohen n\u00eb thelb efikas\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar nj\u00eb nivel mbrojtjeje t\u00eb duhur. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb, Bashkimi Europian nuk k\u00ebrkon q\u00eb normat e tij t\u00eb replikohen nj\u00eblloj nga Shtetet e Bashkuara, sesa q\u00eb e drejta e privat\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb devijimet e tij t\u00eb jet\u00eb e garantuar si n\u00eb Bashkimin Europian, aq edhe Shtetet e Bashkuara.<\/p>\n

Midis Urdh\u00ebrit Ekzekutiv dhe shqiptimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

R\u00ebnd\u00ebsia e flukseve t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Bashkimit Europian dhe Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara ndahet nga t\u00eb dyja pal\u00ebt, q\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb vet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr benefitet e fituara. Pik\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb fluksit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave, Max Scherms, aktivist dhe avokat, ka treguar ngurrim m\u00eb t\u00eb madh p\u00ebrball\u00eb Urdh\u00ebrit Ekzekutiv t\u00eb miratuar nga Sht\u00ebpia e Bardh\u00eb, duke theksuar edhe nj\u00eb her\u00eb akoma sesi ligji Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act<\/em> (FISA) 702 \u2013 n\u00eb fuqi n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara, autorizon agjencit\u00eb kryesore t\u00eb inteligjenc\u00ebs si NSA, FBI dhe CIA t\u00eb koleksionojn\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorin informacionet lidhur me qytetar\u00ebt banor\u00eb jasht\u00eb vendit \u2013 p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson nj\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00eb ndaj parimit t\u00eb proporcionalitetit t\u00eb parashikuar nga GDPR. Me v\u00ebmendje t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb ndaj aksesit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave personale nga ana e agjencive amerikane t\u00eb inteligjenc\u00ebs, faktikisht parashikohet q\u00eb k\u00ebta njer\u00ebz mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb aksesin n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat personale q\u00eb u jan\u00eb transferuar organizatave t\u00eb ndodhura n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara p\u00ebr motive t\u00eb siguris\u00eb komb\u00ebtare jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb rastet e parashikuara nga ligji, ashtu si\u00e7 parashikohet n\u00eb kuptimet e FISA. Kjo p\u00ebrb\u00ebn themelet p\u00ebr ta legjitimuar mbledhjen dhe trajtimin pasues t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave personale t\u00eb transferuara duke u nisur nga Kontinenti i Vjet\u00ebr.<\/p>\n

Privat\u00ebsia n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara<\/strong><\/p>\n

Duhet konsideruar gjithashtu sesi koncepti i privat\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara \u00ebsht\u00eb kusht\u00ebzuar dhe shtyr\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb ndryshim n\u00eb vite. Koncepti i privat\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara n\u00eb 20 vje\u00e7arin e fundit \u00ebsht\u00eb kusht\u00ebzuar fuqimisht nga ngjarjet e 11 shtatorit dhe m\u00eb pas nga aksionet e shumta malinje q\u00eb Uashingtoni dhe, p\u00ebr refleks, Shtetet e Bashkuara kan\u00eb p\u00ebsuar. Megjith\u00ebse ka nj\u00eb konstante t\u00eb pandryshuar, privat\u00ebsia ndeshet me konceptin e siguris\u00eb komb\u00ebtare. Koncepti i privat\u00ebsis\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i sanksionuar direkt nga kushtetuta amerikane, megjithat\u00eb Bill of Rights <\/em>ia ruan disa aspekte n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet amendamenteve I, III, IV dhe V. Amendamenti i IX, interpretimi i t\u00eb cilit \u00ebsht\u00eb debatuar, e justifikon leximin e thelluar t\u00eb Bill of Rights <\/em>p\u00ebr ta mbrojtur privat\u00ebsin\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra jospecifikisht t\u00eb parashikuar nga amendamentet e tjera. Studiuesit e gjejn\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb rakordohen mbi nj\u00eb koncept t\u00eb vet\u00ebm privat\u00ebsie, duke preferuar t\u00eb n\u00ebnvizojn\u00eb aspekte t\u00eb ndryshme t\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit. Me p\u00ebrkufizim po aq t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb rezulton edhe koncepti i siguris\u00eb komb\u00ebtare. Sipas disa ekspert\u00ebve do t\u00eb ishte aft\u00ebsia e institucioneve komb\u00ebtare p\u00ebr t\u2019i parandaluar kund\u00ebrshtar\u00ebt nga drejtimi i p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb forc\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u2019i d\u00ebmtuar qytetar\u00ebt amerikan\u00eb apo interesat komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb tyre dhe besimin e tyre n\u00eb nj\u00eb aft\u00ebsi t\u00eb till\u00eb t\u00eb qeveris\u00eb, duke ofruar nj\u00eb vizion t\u00eb militarzuar t\u00eb siguris\u00eb. Privat\u00ebsia dhe siguria komb\u00ebtare duket k\u00ebshtu se l\u00ebvizin n\u00eb nj\u00eb sistem dikotomik, duksh\u00ebm n\u00eb kontrast.<\/p>\n

Administratat amerikane, n\u00eb shum\u00eb raste dhe gjat\u00eb viteve, kan\u00eb theksuar nevoj\u00ebn e ruajtjes s\u00eb nj\u00eb shkalle sigurie rreth politikave dhe mjeteve t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorura n\u00eb zona kritike me q\u00ebllim q\u00eb efikasiteti i tyre t\u00eb mos jet\u00eb i kompromentuar. Edhe Leon Panetta, drejtor i CIA midis viteve 2009 e 2011 dhe m\u00eb pas sekretar i Mbrojtjes deri m\u00eb 2013, ka theksuar gjer\u00ebsisht r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb e faktorit sekret p\u00ebr ta mbrojtur sigurin\u00eb komb\u00ebtare n\u00eb kontekstin e ri nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar. Krucialiteti i konceptit t\u00eb privat\u00ebsis\u00eb e forcon k\u00ebshti karakterin gjeopolitik t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7el\u00ebsi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pozicionim europian n\u00eb skenarin global t\u00eb bazuar mbi nj\u00eb ekuilib\u00ebr t\u00eb ri pushteti t\u00eb bazuar gjithmon\u00eb tek t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat. Faktikisht, kush i mban si edhe i p\u00ebrpunon t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat g\u00ebzon nj\u00eb avantazh kompetitiv jo t\u00eb par\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm. P\u00ebr nj\u00eb qllim t\u00eb till\u00eb, vler\u00ebsimi i p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb i Komisionit Europian duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbaj\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebrisht brenda tij edhe sesi nj\u00eb vendim i till\u00eb do t\u00eb ket\u00eb impakte mbi kompetitivitetin e bizneseve europiane n\u00eb tregun global. Faktikisht t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat jan\u00eb crown jewels<\/em> jo si t\u00eb dh\u00ebna n\u00eb vet\u00ebvete, por n\u00eb at\u00eb sesi nxjerrja dhe ruajtja e tyre, si edhe rip\u00ebrpunimi, \u00ebsht\u00eb i mundur vler\u00ebsimi i tyre. Kjo mund t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb si n\u00eb nivel komb\u00ebtar, ashtu edhe mbikomb\u00ebtar, por impaktet dhe pasojat jan\u00eb ndjesh\u00ebm t\u00eb ndryshme. Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb rast\u00ebsi q\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara kan\u00eb n\u00ebnkuptuar gjithmon\u00eb dhe vazhdojn\u00eb ta mbrojn\u00eb interesin komb\u00ebtar n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet mbrojtjes si interesave t\u00eb bizneseve komb\u00ebtare q\u00eb shfaqen n\u00eb skakier\u00ebn nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare. T\u00eb dish t\u2019i jap\u00ebsh vler\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb madhe t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave q\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruarn \u00e7do aspekt t\u00eb jet\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb prej nj\u00eb kohe t\u00eb gjate nj\u00eb instrument gjeopolitike n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha aspektet.<\/p>\n

Konkluzione<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, nga vendimi i p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebris\u00eb i p\u00ebrhapur nga Komisioni Europian dhe nga Urdh\u00ebri Ekzekutiv i Sht\u00ebpis\u00eb s\u00eb Bardhe del mbijetesa e e\u00ebement\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar nj\u00eb framework t\u00eb ri normativ p\u00ebr fluksin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Bashkimit Europian dhe Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara, n\u00eb respektim t\u00eb legjislacioneve dhe t\u00eb tutelave ndaj shteteve, pse jo edhe qytetar\u00ebve, n\u00eb linj\u00eb edhe me sa parashikohet nga GDPR. Kjo af\u00ebrsi me nj\u00eb marr\u00ebveshje t\u00eb re megjithat\u00eb nuk i heq t\u00eb gjitha pengesat nga rrug\u00ebtimi. Faktikisht, mbesin t\u00eb q\u00ebndrueshme t\u00eb gjitha instrumentat ligjor\u00eb n\u00eb dispozicion. Ve\u00e7 gj\u00ebrave t\u00eb tjera, duhet konsideruar se urgjenca p\u00ebr ta futur n\u00eb normativ\u00eb rolin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave forcohet edhe nga iniciativa normative t\u00eb tjera n\u00eb gjirin europian si, ve\u00e7 t\u00eb tjerash, Data Governance Act <\/em>dhe Direktiva NIS2. Boca e vendimit mbi p\u00ebrshtatshm\u00ebrin\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb tani n\u00eb shqyrtimin e Europian Data Protection Board. Output<\/em> do t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb mendim jodetyrues q\u00eb do t\u2019i transmetohet m\u00eb tej komitetit t\u00eb shteteve an\u00ebtare t\u00eb Bashkimit Europian. Midis aktor\u00ebve q\u00eb do ta vler\u00ebsojn\u00eb s\u00ebrish marr\u00ebveshjen e re figuron edhe Gjykata Europiane e Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb. P\u00ebrtej bilancimit t\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb duhet t\u00eb arrihet midis dy historive, zhvillimet e fundit normative do t\u00eb sanksionojn\u00eb nj\u00eb dimension t\u00eb ri t\u00eb dixhitalit. Tashm\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb thuajse e r\u00ebndomt\u00eb, por jo p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb merret e mir\u00ebqen\u00eb, t\u00eb shoq\u00ebrohet koncepti i dixhitales, kaq kalimtar dhe kaq i palidhur me ndonj\u00eb territorialitet, me konceptin e gjeopolitik\u00ebs ngusht\u00ebsisht e lidhur me iden\u00eb e kufirit, konformimit gjeografik dhe pushtetit t\u00eb aktor\u00ebve kryesor\u00eb nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar\u00eb. B\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr mbizot\u00ebrimin e paligjsh\u00ebm t\u00eb nj\u00ebr\u00ebs an\u00eb ndaj tjetr\u00ebs? Ka mund\u00ebsi. Skenari nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar aktual mbyllet edhe nga dimensioni dixhital, duke mos b\u00ebr\u00eb gj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr ve\u00e7se t\u00eb shtyj\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb territorializim t\u00eb domenit dixhital, nj\u00eb dimension ende kontradiktor, midis hapjesh dhe mbylljesh, aleancash dhe ndarjesh.<\/p>\n

(nga Geopoliticus<\/em>)<\/p>\n

P\u00ebrgatiti<\/strong><\/p>\n

ARMIN TIRANA<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00eb vitin 2016 Komisioni Europian shqiptohej n\u00eb favor t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtashm\u00ebris\u00eb lidhur me Privacy Shield, framework normativ q\u00eb rregullonte fluksin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave midis Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara dhe Bashkimit Europian. Kat\u00ebr vite m\u00eb pas, Gjykata e Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb e Bashkimit Europian ka nxjerr\u00eb Vendimin Schrems II, duke e anulluar k\u00ebshtu Privacy Shield. N\u00eb jav\u00ebt e …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":33618,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33617"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33617\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33618"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foltore.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}